Step 6 of 6 · Marketing Action Plan (MAP)

How to write a marketing plan that grows what’s working without losing margin.

It’s the planning meeting after the best quarter marketing has had in years. One channel is finally bringing in good customers at a cost everyone can live with, so someone proposes putting a lot more money behind it, and nobody objects because the numbers support it. Two quarters later the channel is still producing, but the newest customers cost noticeably more than the first ones did, sales is calling leads back a day later than it used to, and operations has asked for a meeting about the backlog.

In ProfitPaths® the last step is where everything comes together in a Marketing Action Plan (MAP): one written plan that ties your IMPACT Offering, IMPACT Prospect, Prospect Magnets, Prospect-to-Lead Conversion and Channel Selection into a sequence your whole team follows, adds what successful competitors are already saying to the same buyer, and names the number each step will be judged by. That plan is also how you scale without losing margin, because it adds budget in steps small enough to read, judges each step by what the added customer costs rather than the average, and finds the real limit on your growth before you run into it, which is often in sales, delivery or cash rather than in marketing.

The MAP comes last because it can only be written from what the first five steps have found and proven, and once growth is predictable it sends you back to step 1 with better numbers than you started with.

The Marketing Action Plan

Put the plan in writing, so it changes when the numbers do rather than with every new idea.

When growth depends on memory and the latest idea, the plan changes every month and nobody can say afterward what produced the results. A written plan fixes that, because it makes every change a decision someone has to argue for against what’s already agreed. In ProfitPaths that plan is the Marketing Action Plan, and it’s where the six steps on this site come together. The MAPs we write with clients often run past 60 pages, though what matters more than length is that every step is in it, in order, with the number it will be judged by.

StepWhat the plan saysThe contractor’s plan (example)
1 IMPACT OfferingThe IMPACT Offering you’re growing, and why it was chosen.Maintenance agreements
2 IMPACT ProspectThe IMPACT Prospect you’re aiming at, described well enough that sales would recognize one.Property management firms
3 Prospect MagnetsThe Prospect Magnets that draw that buyer in, and how many of the people who use them become leads.A free five-year HVAC replacement forecast
4 Prospect-to-Lead ConversionThe pages, offers and follow-up process that turn attention into qualified leads and sales, and how many prospects become leads and leads become sales.A dedicated page and a same-day call
5 Channel SelectionThe channels that carry the magnets to that buyer, what you can afford to spend to win each customer, and the source of truth you’ll trust when the platforms disagree.Google search, LinkedIn and outreach to a named list, the building owners’ association, SEO later, and up to $13,680 to win a firm
6 Marketing Action PlanWhat competitors are already saying to the same buyer and how you’ll stand apart, the budget, the size of each spend step, the real limits you’ve found, the order you’ll do things in, who owns each piece, and when you’ll review it.LinkedIn first, Google and the association at proven levels, with onboarding capacity setting the pace

Build the budget backward from the customers you need

Start from the revenue or profit you want, work out how many customers that takes, then how many qualified opportunities and leads that requires at your real conversion rates, and only then what each channel needs to spend at its proven cost per customer. A budget built that way can be defended line by line, because every number traces back to something you’ve measured.

Review it on a fixed schedule rather than whenever a new idea arrives

Look at the numbers monthly and the plan itself quarterly, and change it only when the numbers or something real in the business change. Expect the first three months of any new plan to be setup and learning, with scaling starting once you know what works, and give leaders who compare a monthly marketing investment with a salesperson’s salary a straight answer on that timeline from the start.

Competitive and market analysis

Study what successful competitors already say to your IMPACT Prospect, then decide how you’ll stand apart.

Every MAP includes a competitive and market analysis, because the competitors already winning your IMPACT Prospect have been testing hooks and copy on that same buyer with their own budgets. We look at what they lead with, which problems they promise to solve, what they offer a new visitor and how their ads and pages are written, and the themes that keep coming up across several of them are usually the ones that buyer responds to.

The plan then uses those themes without copying them, and puts its weight on what only you can claim, whether that’s a specialty in one industry, deeper knowledge of a local market or a more personal kind of service. A plan built from competitor research alone ends up sounding like everyone it studied, which is why the differentiation is written into the MAP alongside the research.

Illustrative example

For the contractor, that means reading what the other commercial HVAC firms in its area say to property managers on their websites, in their LinkedIn ads and at the building owners’ association before it writes its own pages and ads, so the forecast and the same-day call are pitched against what those buyers are already hearing.

The MAP’s scorecard

Every step has a number that's easy to report, and a harder one that tells you whether it's working.

The MAP judges each step by the number in the third column. Most marketing reports are built from the easy column, and while those numbers help diagnose problems inside a step, they become dangerous when they're reported as success, because each of them can improve while profit gets worse.

StepEasy to report, misleading on its ownThe profit checkWhere the number comes from
1 IMPACT OfferingRevenue by product or serviceGross profit per customer after the cost of winning them, by offeringFinance's margins by line, plus the cost to win from the CRM
2 IMPACT ProspectLead count by segmentLifetime gross profit by type of customerCRM customer records joined to finance's margins
3 Prospect MagnetsDownloads, requests and page viewsShare of the people who use a magnet who become qualified leadsThe magnet’s form, tracked through to the CRM
4 Prospect-to-Lead ConversionForm fills and website trafficShare of prospects who become qualified leads and of leads who become sales, time to first response, cost per saleCRM, call tracking, sales records
5 Channel SelectionImpressions, clicks, cost per click, and conversions and return on ad spend as each platform reports themCost per qualified opportunity and per customer, and revenue and margin, by channel in your own source of truthSpend from each platform, outcomes from the CRM with source tracking, reconciled with finance
6 Marketing Action Planthis pageTotal return across all spendWhat the next step up in spend brings back, after costsEach step up in spend, read in the CRM

A cost per qualified opportunity is spend divided by the leads sales accepts as real opportunities, and return on ad spend is the revenue a platform attributes to its ads divided by what you spent there. If your monthly report stops at clicks, leads or the revenue a platform says it drove, the third column is what's missing from it.

Scale only what you’ve measured

Start with the channel your own numbers say is paying back.

Everything from here on assumes you know which spend is paying back, in a source of truth you trust. If you don’t yet, the Channel Selection step comes first, because scaling a channel on the strength of its own platform report puts more money behind a number that may never have been true.

Where the contractor left off

For the HVAC contractor we’ve followed since the IMPACT Offering page, that work pointed at LinkedIn, which was the most expensive channel per agreement and also the one reaching the larger property management firms whose agreements cover the most buildings.

LinkedIn, per quarter
$9,000
Agreements
2, at $4,500 each
Buildings per firm
about 5
Lifetime gross profit each, after the cost to win
$155,100
Illustrative examplethe channel worth growing

Watch what the next customer costs, not the average

Judge every step up in spend by what the added customer costs, because the average hides it for months.

Every channel eventually reaches a point where each extra dollar buys less than the one before, because you’ve already won the buyers who were easiest to reach. The cheap early customers keep pulling the average down after the newest ones have become expensive, so the number to watch is the extra spend divided by the extra customers it brought in. Here the contractor raises LinkedIn one step a quarter, starting from the quarter on the Channel Selection page.

Illustrative example These are the contractor’s LinkedIn figures, raised one step a quarter, so replace them with yours.

Average cost per customer Cost of each added customer Most you can afford to win one
$0$2k$4k$6k$8k$10k$12k$14k$16k$9k2 customers$4,500$13.5k3 customers$6,500$20k4 customers$10,000$30k5 customers$13,680 ceilingavg $6,000

What the steps say

Every added customer still costs less than you can afford, so marketing isn’t the limit yet.

The most expensive added customer cost $10,000, under the $13,680 ceiling, so before the next step, check whether sales, delivery and cash can keep up.

StepSpend in the periodNew customersAverage costCost of each added customer
1$4,500starting point
2$4,500$4,500
3$5,000$6,500
4$6,000$10,000
Most you can afford to spend to win one customerThe contractor keeps the $13,680 it set for an average three-building firm, which is cautious for the larger firms LinkedIn brings in.

Cost of each added customer = the extra spend over the previous step, divided by the extra customers it brought in. Nothing you enter here is saved or sent anywhere.

In the example the average rises only a third, from $4,500 to $6,000, while the cost of the newest agreement more than doubles, which is exactly what a report built on averages would miss. Even so, the fifth agreement is still a good trade, because at $10,000 it sits well under the $13,680 the contractor decided in the Channel Selection step it could afford to win a property manager, so marketing isn’t what’s holding growth back.

Watching the added customer shows when a channel is starting to run out of room, well before the average gets bad enough for anyone to notice, and it tells you how much room is left before the next step stops paying for itself. When the cost of the added customer approaches what you can afford to spend to win one, hold the budget there and put the next dollar somewhere else.

Find the real limit before you hit it

When marketing starts working, the first thing to break is usually outside marketing.

That’s why so many companies feel that growing what works keeps breaking things. Growth usually stalls on one limit at a time, and whichever comes first sets the pace for everything else.

“It works, but growing it keeps breaking things.”

If that’s what brought you here from the leak finder on the home page, this check is the place to start.

Illustrative example

The contractor’s limit turns out to be its service team, which can onboard about 15 new buildings a quarter with the technicians it has. By the fourth quarter, LinkedIn alone is bringing in about 25 buildings (five firms with about five buildings each), and new agreements across all its channels add more than 40.

Looking back, the backlog started in the quarter on the Channel Selection page, which brought in about 34 new buildings, but it looked like a scheduling problem at the time because the marketing numbers were so good.

Example These are the contractor's answers in the fourth quarter, so change them to match your business.

  1. 1
    Marketing

    Is the cost of the added customer still comfortably under what you can afford, with more of your IMPACT Prospects left to reach in that channel?

    The fifth agreement cost $10,000, under the $13,680 ceiling.
  2. 2
    Sales capacity

    Can your team follow up on more leads as quickly and as well as it does now?

    The same-day call from the Prospect-to-Lead Conversion page is still happening.
  3. 3
    Delivery

    Can operations take on more customers without quality slipping, overtime eating the margin or new customers waiting weeks to start?

    About 15 new buildings a quarter can be onboarded, with more than 40 coming in.
  4. 4
    Cash

    Can you fund the cost of winning customers up front, along with any people you’d hire to serve them, while they pay back over time?

    Nobody has asked finance yet.

What sets your pace

Delivery is your real limit, so fix it or plan around it before you raise spend.

The options are to hire and train ahead of demand, hold spend until onboarding catches up, or stagger start dates. Check cash while you’re at it, because the next limit tends to show up as soon as the first one is fixed.

Nothing you choose here is saved or sent anywhere.

Raising ad spend past a sales or delivery limit buys leads you can’t serve well, which is one of the fastest ways to lose margin and reputation at the same time. For the contractor the honest options are to hire and train technicians ahead of demand, to hold LinkedIn at the third-quarter level until onboarding catches up, or to stagger start dates so new buildings arrive at a pace the team can absorb, and each of those is a decision for operations and finance as much as for marketing.

Raise spend in steps you can read

Change one thing at a time, so you can tell afterward what produced the growth.

When spend goes up in one big jump, and new campaigns, new pages and a new channel launch in the same quarter, nobody can say afterward which part of it produced the growth. In our own campaigns, changing several things at once made the results impossible to interpret, which is why we now change one thing, keep everything else the same and give it time to run.

So raise the budget for one proven channel by a step you can afford to lose, hold everything else steady, and give it long enough to show what the added customers cost before you take the next step. The contractor’s steps were about half again each quarter, which is a reasonable starting point, though the right size depends on how quickly your sales cycle turns leads into customers.

Deepen before you add

Take the proven channel to its limit before you spread the team across new ones.

When a channel works, it’s tempting to add two more, and before long the team is spread across so many channels that none of them gets done well. Each new channel starts its learning over, with new creative, new targeting, new tracking and a few months before you can trust its numbers.

The contractor kept Google search and the building owners’ association running at their proven levels while it scaled LinkedIn, and it didn’t add a channel until LinkedIn’s added cost and its delivery capacity showed where the ceiling was.

Decide who does the work

Most growing companies add capacity with a mix, but one person has to own the plan.

  • In-house people, for work that’s constant, central to the business and needs deep company knowledge.
  • An agency, for specialist skills across several channels, and for the experience of having seen the same problems at many companies.
  • Fractional leadership, such as a part-time marketing executive, when you need someone to own the strategy and the plan but aren’t ready for a full-time hire.

Whichever mix you choose, one person needs to own the plan and the numbers, because when each channel has its own owner and nobody owns the plan, budget decisions turn into negotiations between channels.

AI and automation

Use AI where it relieves the limit you’ve found.

AI and automation belong in the same conversation when they’re tied to a specific workflow and a result you can measure, such as hours saved, faster follow-up or more customers served by the same team. In our work, AI tools give weak answers until they’re given the right internal documents and context, and with good context and a review step they get most of the way while a person finishes the job.

Illustrative example

For the contractor, the useful places are the ones that relieve the delivery limit: drafting each building’s onboarding report from the technician’s notes for a service manager to review, sending renewal reminders before agreements expire, and routing every new forecast request to the right service manager within minutes. None of them replaces a technician, but each frees time so the team can take on more buildings without hiring at the same pace.

What doesn’t work

Five ways companies scale themselves into trouble.

  1. 1
    Doubling the budget overnight.

    Big jumps make it impossible to see where returns start falling, so raise spend in steps and read each one before the next.

  2. 2
    Watching the average instead of the added customer.

    The average cost per customer can look fine long after the newest customers have become too expensive to be worth winning.

  3. 3
    Scaling something that isn’t proven.

    A channel with a few good months and no clean measurement is still a guess, and a bigger budget makes it a more expensive one.

  4. 4
    Outgrowing delivery.

    More customers than you can serve well leads to unhappy customers, discounts and lost renewals, which takes back the margin you were trying to grow.

  5. 5
    Cutting the channels that feed the winner.

    The Channel Selection page showed the association influencing deals the platforms credited elsewhere, so a channel that looks weak on its own may be part of what makes the strong one work.

At every size

The method is the same at any size, but the limit you hit first usually isn’t.

If you run a smaller business

Your limit is usually your own time and your capacity to deliver. Scale the one channel that’s working in small steps, write a one-page plan for the year, and decide early what you’ll hand off (to a hire, a freelancer or an agency) before you’re too busy to do it well.

If you lead marketing at a larger company

Your limits are more often coordination and cash, because sales, delivery, finance and marketing all need to move together, so put the plan in writing, share it across those teams, and review the cost of each added customer against what customers are worth every quarter. That’s also the plan your board will want to see before approving more budget.

More on scaling

Guides that go deeper on budgets, teams, AI and automation.

They’re in progress and will be linked here as they’re published.

Coming soon

Marketing Budget: How Much to Invest and Where

For building a budget backward from your revenue goal.

Coming soon

Building the Marketing Team: In-House, Agency or Fractional

For when you need more capacity and aren’t sure what kind.

Coming soon

AI Strategy and Implementation for Mid-Market Companies

For planning where AI will pay for itself in your business.

Coming soon

Business Process Automation: Removing Manual Work From Growth

For finding the manual work that’s slowing growth down.

Coming soon

AI in Marketing and Sales

For practical uses of AI in your marketing and sales process.

  • How to Allocate a Marketing Budget Across Channels: splitting spend by proven cost per customer. coming soon
  • Marketing Budget Template: a template for building the budget backward from revenue. coming soon
  • Diminishing Returns on Marketing Spend: spotting when a channel is running out of room. coming soon
  • How to Scale Google Ads: growing paid search spend without losing efficiency. coming soon
  • How to Scale a Service Business: growing a service company when delivery is the limit. coming soon
  • Fractional CMO: when part-time marketing leadership makes sense. coming soon
  • In-House Marketing vs. Agency: deciding which work to keep and which to hand off. coming soon
  • AI Roadmap: planning AI projects around results you can measure. coming soon
  • Cost of Automation vs. Cost of Labor: working out whether automating a task pays. coming soon

Next: back to step 1

Go back to your IMPACT Offering with better information than you had the first time.

Once your IMPACT Offering is growing predictably and you know which limit sets the pace, it’s time to look at the offering mix again and start the cycle over. For the contractor, that might mean building the next round of marketing around the installations that about one in five maintenance customers go on to buy, or scoring a second type of buyer, and either way it starts back at the first question with real numbers where there used to be estimates.

Want help writing your Marketing Action Plan?

A Marketing Action Plan is what we build with our clients. Request a free ProfitPaths® assessment and we’ll look at your plan as it stands, point out the most valuable opportunities you might not be seeing, and you’ll leave with specific advice whether or not you ever hire us.

Free, with a real person from the 5K team. Takes about a minute to request.